...
Napisał(a)
W tym problem, że ludzie widzą coś innego niż to o czym jest mowa...
Pomijając złą wolę, czyja to wina ? Byc może rzeczwiście jestem uprzedzony, naoglądałem się różności i co jeden filmik, to lepszy .
Pomijając złą wolę, czyja to wina ? Byc może rzeczwiście jestem uprzedzony, naoglądałem się różności i co jeden filmik, to lepszy .
"...krzywda duszy, gdy życie bez walki oddajesz."
...
Napisał(a)
Czlowiek nie szkolony, szkolony krotko albo szkolony zle widzac walke widzi chaos, agresje, sile i wielkosc przeciwnikow. No i moze jeszcze slyszy chalasy, co dodatkowo mu wzmacnia wrazenie zamieszania i przypadkowosci.
Czlowiek szkolony widzi nastepstwa ruchow. Kolejne sytuacje, ktore logicznie wynikaja jedne z drugich. Czyli widzi co sie wydarzylo, ze jakas reka czy noga doszla a inna nie. Widzi dlaczego uderzajaca konczyna zostala przekierowa, dlaczego poszla do przodu akurat ta noga, dlaczego ktos byl w danym miejscu odsloniety w tej konkretnej sekundzie, chociaz we wszystkich poprzednich akurat "trzymal garde" itd.
Czlowiek nie szkolony lub zle szkolony tego wszystkiego nie widzi. Jego zdolnosc reagowania warunkowana jest tym, jak bardzo przestraszy sie przeciwnika. Stad naturalnie pojawia sie przekonanie, ze wygrywanie zawdziecza sie bardziej agresywnemu, twardszemu lub szybszemu poruszaniu. Bo kiedy takie ruchy widzi, to czuje respekt, a kiedy widzi ruchy powolne, to respektu nie odczuwa. Ktos taki nie wie tego, ze w walce ruchy wynikaja jedne z drugich. Kazdy jest widziany jako oddzielny.
Shimada walczy bardzo dobrze. Na kawalkach klipow widac, jak w sposob bardzo zorganizowany laczy kolejne parowania, przekierowania, wypchniecia, zejscia i kontry. Wyksztalcil to w ten wlasnie sposob - cwiczac naturalne ruchy wynikajace jeden z drugiego samemu i z partnerem. Czego wcale nie trzeba robic zawsze z pelna sila ani z pelna szybkoscia. W swojej sekcji do cwiczenia stojki czesto uzywam metody spowolnionego ruchu, plynnego ruchu, sposobow uczenia wyczucia balansu, wypchniec itd. Poczatkujacy czesto maja ten problem, ze ciezko im zrozumiec sens cwiczen, dopoki nie zobacza wlasnie tego nastepstwa i tego logicznego wynikania. Poczatkujacym osobom trudno jest zaakceptowac plynnosc. Spodziewaja sie raczej, ze ruch w walce powinien byc rwany i powinno cwiczyc sie go silowo i szybko. Spodziewaja sie tez czesto, ze nawet do prostych zadaniowych walk nalezy zmobilizowac jakas dawke agresji. Stad moga czuc sie niekomfortowo, kiedy ta przygotowana dawka agresji okazuje sie wiecej im w danym cwiczeniu przeszkadzac niz pomagac. Zrozumienie przychodzi z czasem. Proponuje przyjrzec sie dokladnie i jesli to mozliwe w zwolnieniu tym fragmentom filmu na ktorych Shimada toczy walke zadaniowa i przeanalizowac kolejne sytuacje i ruchy.
Czlowiek szkolony widzi nastepstwa ruchow. Kolejne sytuacje, ktore logicznie wynikaja jedne z drugich. Czyli widzi co sie wydarzylo, ze jakas reka czy noga doszla a inna nie. Widzi dlaczego uderzajaca konczyna zostala przekierowa, dlaczego poszla do przodu akurat ta noga, dlaczego ktos byl w danym miejscu odsloniety w tej konkretnej sekundzie, chociaz we wszystkich poprzednich akurat "trzymal garde" itd.
Czlowiek nie szkolony lub zle szkolony tego wszystkiego nie widzi. Jego zdolnosc reagowania warunkowana jest tym, jak bardzo przestraszy sie przeciwnika. Stad naturalnie pojawia sie przekonanie, ze wygrywanie zawdziecza sie bardziej agresywnemu, twardszemu lub szybszemu poruszaniu. Bo kiedy takie ruchy widzi, to czuje respekt, a kiedy widzi ruchy powolne, to respektu nie odczuwa. Ktos taki nie wie tego, ze w walce ruchy wynikaja jedne z drugich. Kazdy jest widziany jako oddzielny.
Shimada walczy bardzo dobrze. Na kawalkach klipow widac, jak w sposob bardzo zorganizowany laczy kolejne parowania, przekierowania, wypchniecia, zejscia i kontry. Wyksztalcil to w ten wlasnie sposob - cwiczac naturalne ruchy wynikajace jeden z drugiego samemu i z partnerem. Czego wcale nie trzeba robic zawsze z pelna sila ani z pelna szybkoscia. W swojej sekcji do cwiczenia stojki czesto uzywam metody spowolnionego ruchu, plynnego ruchu, sposobow uczenia wyczucia balansu, wypchniec itd. Poczatkujacy czesto maja ten problem, ze ciezko im zrozumiec sens cwiczen, dopoki nie zobacza wlasnie tego nastepstwa i tego logicznego wynikania. Poczatkujacym osobom trudno jest zaakceptowac plynnosc. Spodziewaja sie raczej, ze ruch w walce powinien byc rwany i powinno cwiczyc sie go silowo i szybko. Spodziewaja sie tez czesto, ze nawet do prostych zadaniowych walk nalezy zmobilizowac jakas dawke agresji. Stad moga czuc sie niekomfortowo, kiedy ta przygotowana dawka agresji okazuje sie wiecej im w danym cwiczeniu przeszkadzac niz pomagac. Zrozumienie przychodzi z czasem. Proponuje przyjrzec sie dokladnie i jesli to mozliwe w zwolnieniu tym fragmentom filmu na ktorych Shimada toczy walke zadaniowa i przeanalizowac kolejne sytuacje i ruchy.
Pawel Drozdziak
Szkoła Walki Wręcz Vivartha
http://www.vivartha.net
...
Napisał(a)
Bardzo fajny klip!
Podobala mi sie tez ta graficzna prezentacja tego, co sie w zhanzhuangu dzieje :)
Podobala mi sie tez ta graficzna prezentacja tego, co sie w zhanzhuangu dzieje :)
...
Napisał(a)
Na anglojęzycznym forum zamieszczono artykuł o tym człowieku.
Taikiken: Full-Contact Tai Chi?
by Keith Vargo
"The most important thing in the martial arts is strength"
That wouldnt be a surprising quote if it came from a kickboxer or bare-knuckle karate fighter. The fact is, it comes from a book on internal Chinese martial arts. Its the first sentence in the introduction of Secret Techniques of Yi Quan and Taikiken.
The surprises don't stop there. As you read the book, you see lots of familiar postures and soft-style techniques. There's also a heavy emphasis on sparring. Moving meditation is a core concept, but the authors quickly dismiss things like mysterious powers and no-touch knockouts. What you get is a martial art that's nicely summed up by another quote: "If one wants to master the movement of ki, there is no shortcut but to continue primarily training one's internal strength and to accumulate lots of real combat training."
So what is this soft style with hard sparring? Is it really full-contact tai chi? Armed with a little knowledge and a lot of questions, I headed off one evening to meet one of taikiken?s leading masters, Michio Shimada.
At the time, he taught students a couple of nights a week in Tokyo's Shinjuku Park. Although it was around 9:30 p.m. when I arrived, the park was alive with activity. Among all the other visitors, a bunch of guys on a tennis court were standing perfectly still with their arms extended. It was the taikiken group.
I later found out they were doing ritsuzen, which is the heart of yi quan and taikiken practice. Both a warm-up and a form of standing meditation, it encourages practitioners to focus their concentration and find the body's natural balance between muscular tension and relaxation. Everyone carries on at his own pace until the movement is finished.
Some students came over and talked with me while we waited for Shimada to arrive. The first thing I learned was that taikiken isn't a species of tai chi chuan. While the names of the two arts are similar, they spring from different sources: Taikiken descends from yi quan, which emphasizes internal principles over complex forms, and yi quan is an outgrowth of hsing-i chuan (also spelled xing yi quan). Taikiken's founder, Kenichi Sawaii, studied yi quan in China and brought it to Japan. He modified the style he learned, incorporating principles from Japanese martial arts, and named his art taikiken. Shimada was one of his top students.
Next, the students described what the classes were like. They said each session starts with the standing meditation I saw when I arrived. Then they do slow movements. Gradually, they speed things up and eventually do two-person drills. The goal of practice is to maintain the balanced, focused state achieved in ritsuzen, going from slow drills to quick, relaxed fighting techniques.
When Shimada arrived, he greeted me with a broad smile and a firm handshake. He was tall, with longish hair and baggy trousers. He had thick, meaty hands and looked young for his age. After some semiformal introductions and my asking again if it was OK to watch the class, the master went to check out his students one at a time.
At first, Shimada appeared uncomfortable with my presence. However, after 20 minutes, he returned and seemed eager to talk about the art. He reiterated the basic themes his students had told me, adding: "Inner styles are the hardest. Outer styles look harder, but the inner ones are more explosive."
That led straight to questions about the ki in taikiken. What is it and how does it differ from other martial arts? concepts of ki? ?Ki is natural movement-instinct,? Shimada explained. "Taikiken is about beating an opponent and beating a disease through natural movement, focusing the whole body as one muscle."
"It's not about standing and trading punches; it's about throwing techniques with inner energy and using motions to cut down on wasted movement."
That sounded reasonable, but it also sounded like the principles of several internal arts. When I asked why other internal stylists don't emphasize sparring the way he does, he looked as if the answer was obvious. "They don't because they don't know how, he said matter-of-factly. "All the styles are the same if you develop inner power. Sparring is just checking your inner power."
After demonstrating some sparring techniques with one of his advanced students, Shimada tutored the others. I went over my notes and waited for him to finish. The thing that stood out in my mind was that he was a karate champion before taking up taikiken. He says he was an instant convert to the art after Kenichi smacked him down in a match, which caused him to devote nearly 25 years of his life to it.
When Shimada finally returned, it was almost the end of the training session. I thanked him for letting me watch and promised to return, but I had one more question. I wanted to know about his plans for the future of taikiken. He said he was focusing on passing the art on to others the way it had been to him. While he wasn?t interested in popularizing it, he qualified that by saying, "We practice with other people from around the world, and sparring is like a greeting." So if you're into internal martial arts, stop by and say hello. Just remember to bring some headgear.
About the author: Keith Vargo is a freelance writer, researcher and martial arts instructor who currently lives in Japan.
Taikiken: Full-Contact Tai Chi?
by Keith Vargo
"The most important thing in the martial arts is strength"
That wouldnt be a surprising quote if it came from a kickboxer or bare-knuckle karate fighter. The fact is, it comes from a book on internal Chinese martial arts. Its the first sentence in the introduction of Secret Techniques of Yi Quan and Taikiken.
The surprises don't stop there. As you read the book, you see lots of familiar postures and soft-style techniques. There's also a heavy emphasis on sparring. Moving meditation is a core concept, but the authors quickly dismiss things like mysterious powers and no-touch knockouts. What you get is a martial art that's nicely summed up by another quote: "If one wants to master the movement of ki, there is no shortcut but to continue primarily training one's internal strength and to accumulate lots of real combat training."
So what is this soft style with hard sparring? Is it really full-contact tai chi? Armed with a little knowledge and a lot of questions, I headed off one evening to meet one of taikiken?s leading masters, Michio Shimada.
At the time, he taught students a couple of nights a week in Tokyo's Shinjuku Park. Although it was around 9:30 p.m. when I arrived, the park was alive with activity. Among all the other visitors, a bunch of guys on a tennis court were standing perfectly still with their arms extended. It was the taikiken group.
I later found out they were doing ritsuzen, which is the heart of yi quan and taikiken practice. Both a warm-up and a form of standing meditation, it encourages practitioners to focus their concentration and find the body's natural balance between muscular tension and relaxation. Everyone carries on at his own pace until the movement is finished.
Some students came over and talked with me while we waited for Shimada to arrive. The first thing I learned was that taikiken isn't a species of tai chi chuan. While the names of the two arts are similar, they spring from different sources: Taikiken descends from yi quan, which emphasizes internal principles over complex forms, and yi quan is an outgrowth of hsing-i chuan (also spelled xing yi quan). Taikiken's founder, Kenichi Sawaii, studied yi quan in China and brought it to Japan. He modified the style he learned, incorporating principles from Japanese martial arts, and named his art taikiken. Shimada was one of his top students.
Next, the students described what the classes were like. They said each session starts with the standing meditation I saw when I arrived. Then they do slow movements. Gradually, they speed things up and eventually do two-person drills. The goal of practice is to maintain the balanced, focused state achieved in ritsuzen, going from slow drills to quick, relaxed fighting techniques.
When Shimada arrived, he greeted me with a broad smile and a firm handshake. He was tall, with longish hair and baggy trousers. He had thick, meaty hands and looked young for his age. After some semiformal introductions and my asking again if it was OK to watch the class, the master went to check out his students one at a time.
At first, Shimada appeared uncomfortable with my presence. However, after 20 minutes, he returned and seemed eager to talk about the art. He reiterated the basic themes his students had told me, adding: "Inner styles are the hardest. Outer styles look harder, but the inner ones are more explosive."
That led straight to questions about the ki in taikiken. What is it and how does it differ from other martial arts? concepts of ki? ?Ki is natural movement-instinct,? Shimada explained. "Taikiken is about beating an opponent and beating a disease through natural movement, focusing the whole body as one muscle."
"It's not about standing and trading punches; it's about throwing techniques with inner energy and using motions to cut down on wasted movement."
That sounded reasonable, but it also sounded like the principles of several internal arts. When I asked why other internal stylists don't emphasize sparring the way he does, he looked as if the answer was obvious. "They don't because they don't know how, he said matter-of-factly. "All the styles are the same if you develop inner power. Sparring is just checking your inner power."
After demonstrating some sparring techniques with one of his advanced students, Shimada tutored the others. I went over my notes and waited for him to finish. The thing that stood out in my mind was that he was a karate champion before taking up taikiken. He says he was an instant convert to the art after Kenichi smacked him down in a match, which caused him to devote nearly 25 years of his life to it.
When Shimada finally returned, it was almost the end of the training session. I thanked him for letting me watch and promised to return, but I had one more question. I wanted to know about his plans for the future of taikiken. He said he was focusing on passing the art on to others the way it had been to him. While he wasn?t interested in popularizing it, he qualified that by saying, "We practice with other people from around the world, and sparring is like a greeting." So if you're into internal martial arts, stop by and say hello. Just remember to bring some headgear.
About the author: Keith Vargo is a freelance writer, researcher and martial arts instructor who currently lives in Japan.
Andrzej Kalisz - AKADEMIA YIQUAN http://www.yiquan.pl
...
Napisał(a)
dacheng:
To nie wypowiedź przeznaczona na forum-tylko artykuł z "Black Belt". Wrzucałem link do tego materiału gdzieś na poprzedniej stronie.
To nie wypowiedź przeznaczona na forum-tylko artykuł z "Black Belt". Wrzucałem link do tego materiału gdzieś na poprzedniej stronie.
http://www.bushido24.pl
Masz pytania dotyczące sztuk walki? Przeczytaj FAQ:
http://www.sfd.pl/PRZECZYTAJ_ZANIM_ZAŁOŻYSZ_NOWY_TEMAT.-t406577.html
...
Napisał(a)
Fakt, już było. Zdążyłem zapomnieć
Andrzej Kalisz - AKADEMIA YIQUAN http://www.yiquan.pl
Polecane artykuły